[ad_1]
Other Redditors on the thread didn’t necessarily seem convinced, but at least a few thanked the original poster for pointing out a cool small detail, like u/TheRealTomSnow: «Thats a great detail, saw the film a dozen times and never noticed. Thanks OP!» Others were frustrated that the post reminded them of «Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,» which happens to be the least favorite «Harry Potter» film for some fans. «That second picture makes me angry because it reminds me of what a travesty the 6th movie was!» u/nursewithnolife wrote.
Others pointed out, that, while the theory is cool, it doesn’t really make much sense. As u/VflShagrath succinctly wrote, «Close but not the same.» Meanwhile, u/scienceteacher91 agreed, responding, «Right? They’re definitely not the same bottle.» Another Redditor, u/superjames_16, chimed in: «Maybe he noted a similarity? But yeah he’s been collecting those memories for years.»
All in all, the fans voicing dissent are probably right; while the Pensieve vial detail is definitely a nice visual callback to the ad in the London Underground, Albus Dumbledore is not stealing (or buying) and subsequently emptying perfume vials in order to store his precious memories. Not only is it much more likely that the vials are made from a magical substance, but there’s one major factor at play here that makes it impossible for this theory to be true.
[ad_2]
Deja una respuesta